<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.rwandering.net/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for rwandering.net</title>
	
	<link>http://rwandering.net</link>
	<description>The blogged wandering of Robert W. Anderson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.rwandering.net/rwanderingComments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="rwanderingcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Services Continuum by In the Cloud Computing « ห้องลับ</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/07/03/cloud-services-continuum/comment-page-1/#comment-237154</link>
		<dc:creator>In the Cloud Computing « ห้องลับ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/07/03/cloud-services-continuum/#comment-237154</guid>
		<description>[...] รูปที่ 1 Image from Robert W. Anderson’s blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] รูปที่ 1 Image from Robert W. Anderson&#8217;s blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use the marginal kWH cost for efficiency savings! by John Powers</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2011/06/14/marginal-kw/comment-page-1/#comment-228059</link>
		<dc:creator>John Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=703#comment-228059</guid>
		<description>Absolutely correct, Robert -- It's amazing how many energy efficiency / renewable resource companies get this wrong.  The ONLY thing that matters to the customer is their MARGINAL energy price.  This is Econ 1 stuff.  Yet (due to laziness or ease of packaging or ignorance or indifference) companies continue to do analysis on meaningless AVERAGE prices.  I actually had a solar installation contractor come visit without understanding the tiered rates PG&amp;E imposes on residential customers.  Here's a guy selling a system for more than $30K, and he's got the economics completely wrong.  

I think most companies assume that if they shout "green" loud enough, they'll find the part of the market that cares about saving the planet, and that's good enough.  With even a little more care in their analysis, they could find the even larger market that also cares about saving money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely correct, Robert &#8212; It&#8217;s amazing how many energy efficiency / renewable resource companies get this wrong.  The ONLY thing that matters to the customer is their MARGINAL energy price.  This is Econ 1 stuff.  Yet (due to laziness or ease of packaging or ignorance or indifference) companies continue to do analysis on meaningless AVERAGE prices.  I actually had a solar installation contractor come visit without understanding the tiered rates PG&amp;E imposes on residential customers.  Here&#8217;s a guy selling a system for more than $30K, and he&#8217;s got the economics completely wrong.  </p>
<p>I think most companies assume that if they shout &#8220;green&#8221; loud enough, they&#8217;ll find the part of the market that cares about saving the planet, and that&#8217;s good enough.  With even a little more care in their analysis, they could find the even larger market that also cares about saving money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Windows to rule them all by Savas Parastatidis</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2011/06/06/one-windows-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-227551</link>
		<dc:creator>Savas Parastatidis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=700#comment-227551</guid>
		<description>Disclaimer: I don't work for the Windows org and i have absolutely no insight about their plans. In fact, I only saw the new UI at the same time as the rest of the world. What follows is just my personal opinion...

I wonder whether folks are considering the following... Could it be that "Windows" is just the kernel and the set of services/functionality that it provides, adjusted to the capabilities of the underlying hardware? The experience can then be adjusted, following a common UX theme based on Metro, according what can be done with the available screen estate, hardware, input devices, and so on. The huge benefit for developers and consumers would be the common platform. We standardize on the apps/tasks that we can perform, following a common UX theme, rather than on a set of windows and a chrome. I can access the same applications on my phone, laptop, desktop, TV, Xbox, and so on. Everything gets synced with the cloud. When I use "windows, I use the entire ecosystem. In my mind (again, this is a personal opinion), "Windows" represents the ecosystem that is being built to support my entire experience around apps/services.

I'd like to emphasize again that this represents my personal experience :-)

Cheers,
.savas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disclaimer: I don&#8217;t work for the Windows org and i have absolutely no insight about their plans. In fact, I only saw the new UI at the same time as the rest of the world. What follows is just my personal opinion&#8230;</p>
<p>I wonder whether folks are considering the following&#8230; Could it be that &#8220;Windows&#8221; is just the kernel and the set of services/functionality that it provides, adjusted to the capabilities of the underlying hardware? The experience can then be adjusted, following a common UX theme based on Metro, according what can be done with the available screen estate, hardware, input devices, and so on. The huge benefit for developers and consumers would be the common platform. We standardize on the apps/tasks that we can perform, following a common UX theme, rather than on a set of windows and a chrome. I can access the same applications on my phone, laptop, desktop, TV, Xbox, and so on. Everything gets synced with the cloud. When I use &#8220;windows, I use the entire ecosystem. In my mind (again, this is a personal opinion), &#8220;Windows&#8221; represents the ecosystem that is being built to support my entire experience around apps/services.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to emphasize again that this represents my personal experience <img src='http://rwandering.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
.savas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Windows 8 by rwandering.net » One Windows to rule them all</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2011/06/03/thoughts-on-windows-8/comment-page-1/#comment-227536</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » One Windows to rule them all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=694#comment-227536</guid>
		<description>[...] comparison to the old Windows Mobile world, although not technically “One Windows to rule them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comparison to the old Windows Mobile world, although not technically &#8220;One Windows to rule them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Windows 8 by The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #866</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2011/06/03/thoughts-on-windows-8/comment-page-1/#comment-227522</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #866</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=694#comment-227522</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts on Windows 8 - Robert W. Anderson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts on Windows 8 &#8211; Robert W. Anderson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on the death of WinFx (Part 3) by rwandering.net » Thoughts on Windows 8</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2007/01/19/more-on-the-death-of-winfx-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-227340</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » Thoughts on Windows 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2007/01/19/more-on-the-death-of-winfx-part-3/#comment-227340</guid>
		<description>[...] for core Windows development from day 1.  OK, from day 2, because on day 1 they said .NET would be the new Windows API.  It never happened.  And this is just another indication that it never [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for core Windows development from day 1.  OK, from day 2, because on day 1 they said .NET would be the new Windows API.  It never happened.  And this is just another indication that it never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Virtual PC / XP Mode Saves the Day by Dan Dar3</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2010/05/17/windows-virtual-pc-xp-mode-saves-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-219006</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dar3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2010/05/17/windows-virtual-pc-xp-mode-saves-the-day/#comment-219006</guid>
		<description>I had recently an issue sort of similar on a laptop recently (http://dandar3.blogspot.com/2010/12/windows-7-xp-mode-troubles.html) and I would suggest stopping SuperFetch on the host (unless you use ReadyBoost), set a fixed swap file (min = max), exclude the VM location in the AV software and I'd say most importantly download &amp; install the latest version of Windows XP Mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had recently an issue sort of similar on a laptop recently (<a href="http://dandar3.blogspot.com/2010/12/windows-7-xp-mode-troubles.html" rel="nofollow">http://dandar3.blogspot.com/2010/12/windows-7-xp-mode-troubles.html</a>) and I would suggest stopping SuperFetch on the host (unless you use ReadyBoost), set a fixed swap file (min = max), exclude the VM location in the AV software and I&#8217;d say most importantly download &amp; install the latest version of Windows XP Mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please make GAFD a first class citizen by rwandering.net » Google Apps becomes 1st class citizen</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/10/09/please-make-gafd-a-first-class-citizen/comment-page-1/#comment-216297</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » Google Apps becomes 1st class citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=596#comment-216297</guid>
		<description>[...] my account to work more like a standard Google account.  I’ve complained about this in the past and am glad they’ve resolved [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my account to work more like a standard Google account.&#160; I’ve complained about this in the past and am glad they’ve resolved [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abandoning Chrome until it supports WSR by rwandering.net » Thank you, Google! Chrome starts supporting WSR!</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/04/13/abandoning-chrome-until-it-supports-wsr/comment-page-1/#comment-216180</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » Thank you, Google! Chrome starts supporting WSR!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2009/04/13/abandoning-chrome-until-it-supports-wsr/#comment-216180</guid>
		<description>[...] time ago I posted that I was abandoning Chrome until it supports Windows Speech Recognition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time ago I posted that I was abandoning Chrome until it supports Windows Speech Recognition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Counting the days till Silverlight announced for iPhone by rwandering.net » Silverlight to be announced for the iPhone soon?</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/03/19/counting-the-days-till-silverlight-announced-for-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-216031</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » Silverlight to be announced for the iPhone soon?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/03/19/counting-the-days-till-silverlight-announced-for-iphone/#comment-216031</guid>
		<description>[...] days ago I posted Counting the days till Silverlight announced for iPhone.  That sure was more than I expected, but how many more days [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] days ago I posted Counting the days till Silverlight announced for iPhone.&#160; That sure was more than I expected, but how many more days [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GMail as a Skype replacement?  Nope . . . by Robert W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2010/08/27/gmail-as-a-skype-replacement-nope/comment-page-1/#comment-215781</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2010/08/27/gmail-as-a-skype-replacement-nope/#comment-215781</guid>
		<description>Colin,

The problem with the Skype VM seems to be on Skype's side.  There is no way to completely turn off voice mail there.  It seems that Skype only forwards incoming calls if you are logged on, otherwise always goes to its own Voicemail.  Some people have suggested that turning on the call screening (or call presentation) feature of GV solves the problem, but I don't really want to screen my calls that way.

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin,</p>
<p>The problem with the Skype VM seems to be on Skype&#8217;s side.  There is no way to completely turn off voice mail there.  It seems that Skype only forwards incoming calls if you are logged on, otherwise always goes to its own Voicemail.  Some people have suggested that turning on the call screening (or call presentation) feature of GV solves the problem, but I don&#8217;t really want to screen my calls that way.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GMail as a Skype replacement?  Nope . . . by Colin Steele</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2010/08/27/gmail-as-a-skype-replacement-nope/comment-page-1/#comment-215749</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2010/08/27/gmail-as-a-skype-replacement-nope/#comment-215749</guid>
		<description>I agree that better incoming-call notifications are a must. If you're working in another window and have sound off (as most people in an office do), you have no way of knowing a call's coming in.

And I'm glad to see I'm not the only one with the Skype "where's my voicemail?" problem. I was thinking I'd configured my Google Voice wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that better incoming-call notifications are a must. If you&#8217;re working in another window and have sound off (as most people in an office do), you have no way of knowing a call&#8217;s coming in.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m glad to see I&#8217;m not the only one with the Skype &#8220;where&#8217;s my voicemail?&#8221; problem. I was thinking I&#8217;d configured my Google Voice wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cloud Services Continuum by eko didik widianto</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/07/03/cloud-services-continuum/comment-page-1/#comment-213309</link>
		<dc:creator>eko didik widianto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 10:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/07/03/cloud-services-continuum/#comment-213309</guid>
		<description>Thank you. 
It makes me get more understanding about cloud computing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.<br />
It makes me get more understanding about cloud computing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows Virtual PC is slow! by rwandering.net » Windows Virtual PC / XP Mode Saves the Day</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2010/03/12/windows-virtual-pc-is-slow/comment-page-1/#comment-212687</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » Windows Virtual PC / XP Mode Saves the Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=612#comment-212687</guid>
		<description>[...] have been critical of poor performance in Windows Virtual PC (most recently, here).  I still can’t explain the performance problems I have seen, but Windows Virtual PC’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been critical of poor performance in Windows Virtual PC (most recently, here).&#160; I still can’t explain the performance problems I have seen, but Windows Virtual PC’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perils of #define by Ansgar</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/01/09/perils-of-define/comment-page-1/#comment-210312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ansgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=515#comment-210312</guid>
		<description>For me the headers name was 'des.h' from cryptsoft.com. I think it was the same for you.
This makes it easier for the next one who's searching that bug.

Thanks for your blog

Ansgar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the headers name was &#8216;des.h&#8217; from cryptsoft.com. I think it was the same for you.<br />
This makes it easier for the next one who&#8217;s searching that bug.</p>
<p>Thanks for your blog</p>
<p>Ansgar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please make GAFD a first class citizen by Shannon Wagner</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/10/09/please-make-gafd-a-first-class-citizen/comment-page-1/#comment-204725</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/?p=596#comment-204725</guid>
		<description>From what I can tell, Latitude's new Location History feature does not support an Android G1 configured to use GAFD, unfortunately, even though the other features of Latitude work fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can tell, Latitude&#8217;s new Location History feature does not support an Android G1 configured to use GAFD, unfortunately, even though the other features of Latitude work fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From PDC2009 Day 1: Entity Framework 4 by Robert W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/11/17/from-pdc2009-day-1-entity-framework-4/comment-page-1/#comment-204562</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2009/11/17/from-pdc2009-day-1-entity-framework-4/#comment-204562</guid>
		<description>I talked to someone today and found:

There are designer improvements, particularly that model changes shouldn't get paved when refreshing the model.  More major changes to help make the model more navigated are planned for the future (i.e., post .NET 4).  

Inserts?  Aside from some small performance improvements, nope.  The woman I spoke to basically asked, "how's that working out for you?" . . . she suggested that we bypass EF and use ADO.NET for the inserts instead.  

I wasn't able to find someone who knew the answer to the GUID / SEQUENTIALGUID questions I had.  That doesn't sound promising to me, but I'll look further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talked to someone today and found:</p>
<p>There are designer improvements, particularly that model changes shouldn&#8217;t get paved when refreshing the model.  More major changes to help make the model more navigated are planned for the future (i.e., post .NET 4).  </p>
<p>Inserts?  Aside from some small performance improvements, nope.  The woman I spoke to basically asked, &#8220;how&#8217;s that working out for you?&#8221; . . . she suggested that we bypass EF and use ADO.NET for the inserts instead.  </p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t able to find someone who knew the answer to the GUID / SEQUENTIALGUID questions I had.  That doesn&#8217;t sound promising to me, but I&#8217;ll look further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From PDC2009 Day 1: Entity Framework 4 by Pandelis</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/11/17/from-pdc2009-day-1-entity-framework-4/comment-page-1/#comment-204521</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2009/11/17/from-pdc2009-day-1-entity-framework-4/#comment-204521</guid>
		<description>Most of these are glaring omissions in v1 (.NET 3.5) and will be much appreciated. It definitely seems like the current version was rushed out the door. This release addresses most of the quirks of v1 (for example no easy access to foreign keys). The ability to access native user defined functions on the database is big for me (because unlike stored procedures, they are composable), as is the ability to unit test without having to modify a database.

Any info on designer improvements, or bulk inserts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of these are glaring omissions in v1 (.NET 3.5) and will be much appreciated. It definitely seems like the current version was rushed out the door. This release addresses most of the quirks of v1 (for example no easy access to foreign keys). The ability to access native user defined functions on the database is big for me (because unlike stored procedures, they are composable), as is the ability to unit test without having to modify a database.</p>
<p>Any info on designer improvements, or bulk inserts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Windows Azure by rwandering.net » From PDC2009 Day 1: Azure &amp; AppFabric</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/10/27/microsoft-windows-azure/comment-page-1/#comment-204520</link>
		<dc:creator>rwandering.net » From PDC2009 Day 1: Azure &amp; AppFabric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/10/27/microsoft-windows-azure/#comment-204520</guid>
		<description>[...] last year’s PDC, I posted It is the openness of this platform, the ability of developers to mix and match the different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last year’s PDC, I posted It is the openness of this platform, the ability of developers to mix and match the different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamic IP and OpenDNS?  Watch out. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/comment-page-1/#comment-201223</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/#comment-201223</guid>
		<description>BTW I've also had this "rare occurrence" happen to me on my university network, which does have a fixed number of assigned dynamic IPs available.  True, in the scheme of the world, 2 people having the same IP and "contacting" each other thru OpenDNS is pretty slim, but in a tiny group such as an office or university with fixed numbers of rotating IP addresses, this can be a serious problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I&#8217;ve also had this &#8220;rare occurrence&#8221; happen to me on my university network, which does have a fixed number of assigned dynamic IPs available.  True, in the scheme of the world, 2 people having the same IP and &#8220;contacting&#8221; each other thru OpenDNS is pretty slim, but in a tiny group such as an office or university with fixed numbers of rotating IP addresses, this can be a serious problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamic IP and OpenDNS?  Watch out. by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/comment-page-1/#comment-201222</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/#comment-201222</guid>
		<description>I believe the most minimally intrusive method of solving this would be to implement what you suggest: dns serving groups.  OpenDNS group A is for people that have an account and use all the crap they offer (crap in the good way).  group B is for people like me, that don't care about all the crap they offer and just want better DNS support.  group B would be zero tracking whatsoever and any ip's that show up in both group A and group B will automatically flushed from group A.

Easy.  No need to install software or do anything different than anybody does now, except have to worry about 4 dns addresses instead of 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the most minimally intrusive method of solving this would be to implement what you suggest: dns serving groups.  OpenDNS group A is for people that have an account and use all the crap they offer (crap in the good way).  group B is for people like me, that don&#8217;t care about all the crap they offer and just want better DNS support.  group B would be zero tracking whatsoever and any ip&#8217;s that show up in both group A and group B will automatically flushed from group A.</p>
<p>Easy.  No need to install software or do anything different than anybody does now, except have to worry about 4 dns addresses instead of 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running Windows 7 RC by Harry</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2009/05/10/running-windows-7-rc/comment-page-1/#comment-201082</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2009/05/10/running-windows-7-rc/#comment-201082</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 is much better than Windows Vista when it comes to performance. i like Windows 7 just like Windows XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 is much better than Windows Vista when it comes to performance. i like Windows 7 just like Windows XP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anonymous delegates are so practical by geeks</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2006/05/11/anonymous-delegates-are-so-practical/comment-page-1/#comment-200580</link>
		<dc:creator>geeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2006/05/11/anonymous-delegates-are-so-practical/#comment-200580</guid>
		<description>Humm... interesting,

Do you know if they have improved this fiture in c#3.5?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humm&#8230; interesting,</p>
<p>Do you know if they have improved this fiture in c#3.5?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamic IP and OpenDNS?  Watch out. by Robert W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/comment-page-1/#comment-200562</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rwandering.net/2008/02/27/dynamic-ip-and-opendns-watch-out/#comment-200562</guid>
		<description>I suggested a way around this in my post, actually.  It doesn't solve the technical problem, but does resolve the dubious user contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggested a way around this in my post, actually.  It doesn&#8217;t solve the technical problem, but does resolve the dubious user contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

